I Am a Strange Loop [Douglas R. Hofstadter] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. One of our greatest philosophers and scientists of the mind. Editorial Reviews. Review. Amazon Best Books of the Month, March : I Am a Strange Loop eBook: Douglas R. Hofstadter: Kindle Store. Scott O’Reilly loops the loop with Douglas Hofstadter.
|Published (Last):||7 January 2013|
|PDF File Size:||3.48 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.37 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Enough, then, of self-referentiality. And that’s pretty damn cool: I have occasional moments of consciousness that make me aware of the long intervals strsnge unconsciousness that I suffer.
The one who came up with the idea in the first place? I got about three-quarters of the way through and by then it seemed like Hofstadter had completely lost the plot. To me the simple answer is: I Am a Strange Loop is a book by Douglas Sttrangeexamining in depth the concept of a strange loop to explain the sense of “I”.
And my complaint specifically is why we’re being asked to concede the point. If we took an ant’s point of view and tried to define “souls” according to the capacities that make ants unique, humans would come out looking poorly, unable to serve their allotted function in the hive or sacrifice themselves unthinkingly when necessary.
He tries to argue through several chapters that the decentered–“strange loopiness”–of consciousness comes about because cognition I enjoyed much of Hostetter’s account of the ways in which a strictly biological account of cognition fails to grasp the complexities of consciousness and identities.
These patterns of symbolic activity have a certain degree of autonomy in so far as they really do simulate the perspective of our significant stramge. It could be noted, first of all, that the slightly milder hypothesis that human beings perceive colours differently as a result of slight variations in their sense organs is not at all implausible from an empirical point of view; it is an established fact.
So it lop with nothing but complete affection that I say many, many, many philosophers- particularly modern, male philosophers- are total fucking assholes who I will happily argue do not possess souls and as such have no business talking about them.
But I love their soulless little hearts anyway. And it’s probably best to do so. As the brain goes, so goes the mind, they say. Every now and then, stdange humans, despite hofstadtre we won’t come to any definite conclusion, need to sit back and wonder what it all means, in a new way each time.
Pages with related products. Dec 20, Robert rated it liked it Shelves: Thus the patterns that represent my love for 19th century novels can easily to replicated in another’s brain–my wife’s for instance–which results in a part of identity having a kind of weak, second order existence in my wife’s brain. He strangd also correct in expanding the frontiers of the soul, I believe — in illustrating how the phenomenon of subjectivity is much more open-ended, permeable and relational than we imagined.
What is the mechanism that bridges the gap between the world of spirit and the world of flesh? The last hundred pages or looo of the book annoyed me so much that I did a lot of skimming. When we share our perspective with a receptive other, we are implanting a part of our self in the other, and vice versa.
I Am A Strange Loop by Douglas Hofstadter | Issue 78 | Philosophy Now
View all 23 comments. The question, then, becomes why is the “I” concept uniquely significant? Rejecting religion or steange basis for any sort of dualism and his remarks are rather disparaging in this respect and declaring oneself a physicalist there is nothing more than physics is par for the course and loo swatting straw-man arguments to the contrary, is all part of atrange contemporary game for most of today’s philosophers and scientists.
An update that I had tried to submit when I finished the book appears not to have saved. Isn’t it at least possible that things like plants or worms have a kind of consciousness that is very important to them, but which, being so physically different from them, we can’t understand? And somewhat like Gilbert Ryle and the other black-box philosophers who believe that mental states are unimportant phenomena, and all that matters is physical behavior, Hofstadter concludes that there is no I there at all.
And the book does an excellent job of presenting his views on just how the “I” forms in a brain, what kind of hardware may be necessary for an “I”, what kinds of “I” am out there, and on how many brains a single “I” may live.
Hofstader is certainly no Dogulas dualist, but his ideas are neither what you would expect from hfstadter material monist. At the University of Michigan and Indiana University, he co-authored, with Melanie Mitchell, a computational model of “high-level perception” — Copycat — and several other models of analogy-making and cognition.
However, because they have the ability to persistently represent external events, and to manipulate those “symbols” in such a way that ideas can accrete to other ideas, where a high-level concept like “sitcom” might include “television” which includes “screen” which includes “image”, etc, it reaches a threshold where the system is able to conceive of itself in symbolic terms, even though at the symbolic level of thought, there one doesn’t observe the individual neurons that physically cause that phnomenon.
You get a level-crossing feedback loop whose apparent solidity dominates the reality of everything else in the world SL,my emphasis in bold.
I Am a Strange Loop
But he really wishes they did, not only because they’re his ideas. There are truths that can not be proved. He’s muddying the issue by on the one hand making an equivalence between a “soul” and “interiority,” which is the self-concept, the strange loop, and on the other hand invoking “soul” as the vital essence of an individual, indefinable but definitely present, what gives a being worth, in Hofstadter’s eyes.
I would have loved to be your mom because you were obviously the kind of kid you could leave in a house alone for dayslike a cat, and come back to find you sitting in the exact same spot you left them staring fixedly at his own hands.
The core of Hofstadter’s consciousness or self, soul, I is the enormous capacity of the human brain for complex operations, among which are feedback loops that grow in number and sophistication until they enable the human consciousness of self, the emergence of an ‘I’, and our ability to conceive of dpuglas mirror others in our minds. So in that way it was personally transformative. Amazon Music Stream millions of songs.
A Critical Review of Douglas Hofstadter’s I Am a Strange Loop | Adam Westra –
We can live in others, just as others can live in us. Nevertheless I have a valid objection which needs to be recorded.
Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. But the later portions of the book become steeped in philosophy, and quite frankly, became a bit boring. After all, plants are living things. How do we come back to the same loop, not a different one?